top of page

Preparing for the AI Revolution: What the House AI Task Force Report Means for Congress and the Federal Government

On Tuesday, the House AI Task Force unveiled their long-awaited report with recommendations for Congress on federal AI adoption. They confirmed discussions with the incoming administration, focusing on the Biden Administration’s AI Executive Order and potential laws to ensure safe and expanded AI use.



Below is a summary of the AI Task Force recommendations. There are some interesting recommendations that stand out, that I address later in the article.


Summary of Recommendations


1. Foster Responsible AI Adoption in Financial Services

  • Objective: Encourage financial services firms to adopt AI responsibly to reap benefits such as cost reduction, improved services, and wider consumer access.

  • Regulatory Role: Ensure firms comply with existing laws or adapt alternative compliance processes for AI use.


2. Increase AI Expertise Among Regulators

  • Need: Regulators should enhance their understanding and adoption of AI to improve oversight and assess regulatory gaps effectively.

  • Impact: This expertise would allow for better enforcement of laws and the evaluation of AI-driven innovations.


3. Protect Consumers and Investors

  • Focus: Safeguard consumer and investor protections, especially against risks like discrimination in AI decision-making within financial and housing sectors.

  • Action for Congress: Review AI benefits and risks while ensuring strong monitoring and enforcement by regulators.


4. Explore Regulatory “Sandboxes”

  • Purpose: Allow regulators to experiment with AI applications in a controlled setting to build practical expertise and manage risks.

  • Benefit: Facilitates a hands-on approach to understanding AI impacts and adapting regulations accordingly.


5. Support Principles-Based Regulatory Approaches

  • Approach: Adopt sector-specific, technology-neutral regulations to accommodate the rapid evolution of AI.

  • Leverage Expertise: Enable primary regulators to apply their domain knowledge while maintaining oversight of AI in their markets.


6. Ensure Small Firms Can Adopt AI

  • Challenge: Smaller firms often lack resources to develop or scale AI compared to larger firms, creating a competitive disparity.

  • Recommendation: Tailor regulatory frameworks to support small firms and avoid stifling innovation, ensuring equitable access to AI tools.


Reading Between the Lines - My Opinion


I believe we will see the following trends accelerate in 2025...


  1. Expect less regulatory frameworks around AI implementation - use it, use it responsibly, but we won't regulate how to use it. Expect a reversal of or modification of the Biden Administration AI Executive Order.


  2. "Sandboxes" to allow for more experimentation with AI will lead to significant pressure on FedRAMP to align with more cost effective approvals of smaller software packages and tools - like emerging AI tools.


  3. Expect outcome based regulations where they are technology-agnostic and values based. Basically - get to this outcome - you figure out how.


  4. Era of AI Regulatory "Bots" is here. Expect AI to support regulatory efforts for both reduction of burden of regulations AND enforcement of regulations.


 
CEO of Flamelit - a start-up Data Science and AI/ML consultancy. Formally the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and U.S. Digital Services Lead at the EPA. Greg was the first Executive Director and Co-Founder of 18F, a 2013 Presidential Innovation Fellow, Day One Accelerator Fellow, GSA Administrator's Award Recipient, and a The Federal 100 and Fedscoop 50 award recipient. He received a degree in Economics with a concentration in Business from St. Mary’s College of Maryland, a Masters in Management of IT from the University of Virginia, and is currently working on a Masters in Business Analytics and AI from NYU.


Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page