AI in Public Service: Deployment vs. Design—Why It Matters

Hey there, tech enthusiasts and public service aficionados! Today, we're diving into a fascinating discussion from UNDP’s Asia-Pacific blog, which can be found right here. The blog post brings to light a crucial aspect of AI integration in the public sector—it’s not just about deploying AI technologies, but thoughtfully shaping them to fit the unique needs and ethical considerations of public service.

Let’s unwrap this, shall we? The core premise of the article is both a warning and a wisdom nugget: simply planting AI technologies into public infrastructure without custom-fitting them to the societal and ethical landscape is akin to wearing shoes on the wrong feet—uncomfortable and counterproductive!

The article argues for a more nuanced approach, emphasizing the 'shaping' rather than just the 'deploying' of AI solutions. One of the significant points made is the necessity for AI systems in public services to be transparent and accountable. After all, these aren’t just any consumers—they’re citizens whose lives and liberties could be significantly impacted by algorithmic decisions.

The blog highlights the potential risks of AI, such as reinforcing existing biases or creating new forms of discrimination. It’s like accidentally programming a robot to be a gourmet chef when you just needed it to toast bread. The stakes are high, and the errors, potentially costly. Moreover, the article advocates for participatory design processes. This involves stakeholders, especially those who are often underrepresented, in the crafting of AI solutions. Think of it as a community potluck; everyone brings a dish to the table, ensuring the final meal is well-rounded and to everyone’s taste.

This approach helps in crafting AI systems that are not only technically sound but also socially sensitive and inclusive. The blog also underscores the importance of setting up robust frameworks for governance and accountability in AI implementations. It’s not enough to build an AI system; setting up the rules of the game (read: regulations) is crucial to ensure that the AI plays nice and plays fair. In essence, the UNDP article serves as a thoughtful reminder that when it comes to integrating AI into public services, the focus must be on shaping technologies that honor ethical dimensions and enhance public welfare, not just on deploying the most advanced tech available.

As for the broader implications of AI, this approach touches several core purposes of using AI: enhancing human capabilities, making smarter decisions, unlocking insights from complex data, and driving efficiency and cost savings. By shaping AI responsibly, we amplify human potential and improve outcomes in public service, ensuring that AI acts not as a replacement, but as a formidable and benevolent ally to human effort.

So, next time you hear about AI in public service, ask not just what AI can do, but how it’s being tailored to do good effectively and ethically!

---

By Greg Godbout from Flamelit

CEO of Flamelit - a start-up Data Science and AI/ML consultancy. Formally the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and U.S. Digital Services Lead at the EPA. Greg was the first Executive Director and Co-Founder of 18F, a 2013 Presidential Innovation Fellow, Day One Accelerator Fellow, GSA Administrator's Award Recipient, and a The Federal 100 and Fedscoop 50 award recipient. He received a degree in Economics with a concentration in Business from St. Mary’s College of Maryland, a Masters in Management of IT from the University of Virginia, and a Masters in Business Analytics and AI from NYU.